Win the Lease: How Top-Performing Properties Use Competitive Intelligence to Increase Occupancy

Here's what's happening right now: A qualified prospect just finished touring your property. Your leasing agent gave a great tour. The units show well. Everything seemed positive.

Then the prospect drives to four more properties. By evening, they've received proposals from five communities, including yours.

The question that determines whether you win that lease: Do you know what those other four properties are offering?

If you don't, you're bringing a knife to a gunfight.

The Modern Leasing Reality

Let's establish what we're actually competing against:

Today's Apartment Shopper

Average prospect behavior:

• Researches 8-12 properties online
• Narrows to 5-6 properties to contact
• Tours 3-4 properties in person
• Takes 7-14 days to make decision
• Compares every detail before signing

What they're comparing:

• Base rent (obvious)
• Move-in specials and concessions
• Lease terms and flexibility
• Amenities and unit features
• Location and accessibility
• Online reviews and reputation
• Pet policies and fees
• Parking availability and cost

Your prospect knows more about your competitors than you do.

The Information Asymmetry Problem

What your prospect sees:

• ✅ Real-time pricing for all options
• ✅ Current concessions and specials
• ✅ Availability and unit options
• ✅ Photos, virtual tours, and reviews
• ✅ Instant comparison across all comps

What you see:

• ❌ Pricing data from 3 months ago
• ❌ Concessions you've heard through the grapevine
• ❌ Limited visibility into competitor availability
• ❌ No understanding of competitor positioning
• ❌ Delayed response to market changes

You're flying blind while prospects have complete information.

What Top Performers Do Differently

We analyzed leasing performance across 3,000+ multifamily properties. Here's what separates 95%+ occupancy properties from 85-90% properties:

Bottom Quartile Properties (85-90% Occupancy)

Their competitive intelligence approach:

• Annual or quarterly rent surveys
• Anecdotal information from prospects
• Occasional mystery shopping
• Gut feel on positioning
• Reactive pricing changes

How they train leasing teams:

• "We're the best in the market"
• Generic value propositions
• Limited comp knowledge
• Unable to overcome price objections
• Don't know why they're losing leases

Result: Constant occupancy struggles, frequent concessions, price-based competition

Top Quartile Properties (95%+ Occupancy)

Their competitive intelligence approach:

• Weekly monitoring of all competitors
• Real-time pricing and concession tracking
• Systematic competitive analysis
• Data-driven positioning strategy
• Proactive market response

How they train leasing teams:

• Specific competitive differentiators
• Knowledge of every nearby comp
• Prepared for price objections
• Understand why prospects choose them
• Data-backed confidence

Result: Sustained high occupancy, minimal concessions, value-based differentiation

The difference? Information.

Seven Ways Competitive Intelligence Wins Leases

1. Strategic Pricing That Wins Qualified Residents

Without competitive intelligence:

• Price based on last year + inflation
• React to occupancy drops with panic concessions
• No understanding of where you sit in the market
• Guess at what "competitive" means

With competitive intelligence:

Real example: Property in Phoenix submarket

Before:

• 1BR priced at $1,650 (seemed competitive)
• Occupancy stuck at 88%
• Losing leases to "cheaper options"

Competitive analysis revealed:

• 5 direct comps ranged from $1,550-$1,750
• But the $1,750 comps offered free parking ($100 value)
• Effective rent on $1,750 comps: $1,650
• Property was actually overpriced by $100 when accounting for parking

Changes made:

• Added parking to lease package
• Raised base rent to $1,725
• Market positioning improved
• Occupancy reached 95% in 90 days

Result: Higher revenue AND higher occupancy through better positioning.

2. Competitive Concession Strategy

The concession trap most properties fall into:

Competitor offers 2 months free → You match → Another competitor offers 3 months free → You match → Race to the bottom → Nobody makes money

The strategic approach:

Real example: Property in Dallas market

Competitive intelligence showed:

• Comp A: 2 months free (new lease-up, desperate)
• Comp B: 1 month free (standard seasonal)
• Comp C: $500 off move-in costs (established, confident)
• Comp D: No concessions (premium position)

Decision: Don't match Comp A's desperation concession. Position between Comp C and D.

Offer created:

• $300 off move-in costs
• Waived application fees
• Flexible move-in dates

Why it worked:

• Avoided profit-killing concessions
• Appealed to quality residents (not bargain hunters)
• Differentiated from desperation plays
• Maintained rate integrity

Result: Filled units at 95% of asking rent instead of 83% effective rent competitors achieved.

3. Training Leasing Teams to Win

The worst thing a leasing agent can say: "Oh, [Competitor]? Yeah, we're better than them."

What top-performing teams say:

"I know [Competitor] well. They're a nice community. The main differences you'll notice are...

• We include parking in our rent, they charge $100/month
• Our fitness center is 24/7, theirs closes at 10pm
• We allow large dogs, they have a 25lb limit
• Our average resident stays 3+ years, so it's a stable community

Based on your priorities—especially having a large dog—I think you'll find we're the better fit. And when you look at total cost including parking, we're actually $75 less per month."

The difference? Specific, confident, data-backed responses.

4. Knowing When to Push vs. When to Hold

Market intelligence reveals the right moves:

Scenario: Spring Leasing Season

What competitive data shows:

• Comp A: 8% available, stable pricing
• Comp B: 3% available, raised prices $100 last week
• Comp C: 15% available, offering concessions
• Comp D (new): Pre-leasing aggressively, undercutting market

Strategic response:

• Don't panic about Comp D (new lease-ups always undercut initially)
• Push pricing on in-demand unit types where market is tight
• Hold pricing on unit types with competitor availability
• Avoid concessions since most market is healthy

Result: Maximize revenue while maintaining occupancy.

Scenario: Winter Softness

What competitive data shows:

• All comps offering move-in specials
• Average concession: 1 month free
• Pricing stable or slightly declining

Strategic response:

• Match market expectations on concessions
• Differentiate on terms (flexible lease lengths, lower deposits)
• Emphasize value over price
• Prepare for spring by minimizing winter concessions

Result: Maintain occupancy without excessive concessions.

5. Overcoming the "I Found It Cheaper" Objection

Without competitive intelligence:

Prospect: "Property X is $200 cheaper per month."

Leasing Agent: "Well, we offer more value..." (vague, defensive)

With competitive intelligence:

Prospect: "Property X is $200 cheaper per month."

Leasing Agent: "I'm familiar with [Property X]. Let me make sure we're comparing apples to apples...

• Are you looking at their 800 sq ft unit or 950 sq ft like ours?
• Does their rent include the $150 parking fee?
• Did they mention the $500 move-in fee?
• Are they offering the '2 months free' special that raises your rent month 3?

When you calculate the actual first-year cost with those factors, the difference is typically $30-40/month. And for that, you get [specific amenities/benefits they care about]."

Result: Prospect realizes they weren't comparing equivalent offers. Objection overcome with facts, not desperation.

6. Winning Before the Tour Even Starts

Top performers pre-qualify and position before tours:

Pre-tour conversation (with competitive intelligence):

"Before we schedule your tour, let me make sure we're a good fit. I know you're probably looking at [Comp A] and [Comp B] as well..."

What this accomplishes:

• Shows market knowledge and confidence
• Positions your property proactively
• Identifies prospect's decision criteria
• Addresses concerns before they become objections
• Qualifies serious prospects vs. tire kickers

Without competitive intelligence:

Generic tour invitation → Prospect tours 5 properties → You have no idea what they're comparing → You lose lease to better-prepared competitor

7. Portfolio-Wide Excellence

For regional managers and multi-property operators:

Individual property view: Each property manager focuses on local comps, misses bigger picture

Portfolio intelligence view:

• Identify which markets are most competitive
• See which properties have pricing power
• Learn what works across different submarkets
• Benchmark PM performance accurately
• Allocate resources to highest opportunity properties

Real example: 15-property portfolio across Southwest

Portfolio analysis revealed:

• 3 properties systematically underpriced (avg $85/unit)
• 2 properties overpriced for their position
• 4 properties could eliminate concessions
• 1 property needed amenity investment to justify pricing

Corrective actions:

• Raised rents on underpriced properties
• Modest reduction on overpriced properties to improve occupancy
• Phased out concessions on 4 properties
• Invested in gym upgrade at 1 property

6-month result:

• Portfolio occupancy: 92% → 96%
• Average rent per unit: +$127
• NOI increase: $1.7M annually

Investment in competitive intelligence: $180,000
ROI: 844%

The Prospect Journey: Where You Win or Lose

Let's walk through a typical prospect's journey and see where competitive intelligence makes the difference:

Stage 1: Online Research (Days 1-3)

What the prospect is doing:

• Searching apartments on Zillow, Apartments.com, etc.
• Reading reviews
• Comparing amenities
• Creating shortlist

Where you need competitive intelligence:

• Ensure your pricing is competitive with what they're seeing
• Know if competitors are running specials
• Understand how you compare in reviews
• Position your listings to stand out

Without intelligence: You might be eliminated before they even call you.

Stage 2: Initial Contact (Days 4-5)

What the prospect is doing:

• Calling/emailing 5-6 properties
• Asking about availability and pricing
• Scheduling tours

Where you need competitive intelligence:

• Respond faster than competitors
• Provide compelling reasons to tour
• Address common comparison questions
• Position value over price

Without intelligence: Generic responses lose to confident, informed competitors.

Stage 3: Property Tours (Days 6-8)

What the prospect is doing:

• Touring 3-4 finalists
• Mentally comparing everything
• Taking notes and photos
• Asking specific comparison questions

Where you need competitive intelligence:

• Anticipate and address comparison points
• Highlight differentiators they care about
• Overcome objections with facts
• Create urgency where appropriate

Without intelligence: Your tour might be great, but you lose in their comparison spreadsheet.

Stage 4: Decision Making (Days 9-14)

What the prospect is doing:

• Comparing all proposals
• Negotiating with finalists
• Checking final details
• Making decision

Where you need competitive intelligence:

• Know what competitors offered
• Structure best final offer
• Create appropriate urgency
• Close confidently

Without intelligence: Competitors with better information outmaneuver you at the finish line.

Building Your Competitive Intelligence System

Here's what top-performing properties monitor:

Daily Monitoring

• Competitor pricing changes
• New concessions or specials
• Availability shifts
• Online reviews and reputation

Weekly Monitoring

• Market trends and patterns
• Competitor occupancy signals
• Seasonal adjustments
• Your relative positioning

Monthly Analysis

• Long-term trend identification
• Competitive strategy effectiveness
• Positioning adjustments needed
• Training topics for leasing team

Quarterly Deep Dives

• Market share analysis
• Win/loss review
• Competitor strategy assessment
• Strategic planning

Real Results: Properties That Made the Switch

Case Study 1: Class A Property in Competitive Suburban Market

Situation:

• 280 units
• Occupancy stuck at 87-90%
• Frequent concessions
• Losing leases to "cheaper" competitors
• Leasing team frustrated

Implementation: Week 1: Started monitoring 12 competitors in real-time

Discoveries:

• "Cheaper" competitors actually had higher effective rent due to fees
• Property was underpricing 2BR units by $150
• Competing properties had 15-20% availability (weak position)
• Main competitor offered parking free (property charged $75)

Strategic changes:

• Raised 2BR rents by $125
• Included parking in lease
• Trained leasing team on effective rent comparisons
• Stopped offering move-in specials (weren't needed)

Results (6 months):

• Occupancy: 87% → 96%
• Concessions eliminated (saving $125,000 annually)
• Rent revenue increased $178,000 annually
• Leasing team confidence soared
• Renewal rate improved 14%

Case Study 2: Workforce Housing Property in Urban Market

Situation:

• 400 units
• High turnover
• Constantly matching competitor concessions
• Race-to-bottom pricing
• Thin margins

Implementation: Implemented portfolio-wide competitive intelligence

Discoveries:

• Market had oversupply (14% average availability)
• But specific unit types were tight (3BR units only 5% available)
• Competitor concessions were timing-based (last week of month)
• Property's pet-friendly policy was unique differentiator

Strategic changes:

• Pushed pricing on 3BR units (+$100)
• Held pricing on 1BR units
• Timed concessions strategically (matching competitor calendar)
• Emphasized pet-friendly positioning in marketing
• Trained team to sell value, not just price

Results (12 months):

• Overall occupancy: 83% → 91%
• 3BR occupancy: 75% → 97%
• Revenue per unit: +$97
• Concession cost reduced 40%
• Net operating income: +$465,000

Case Study 3: Garden-Style Value Property

Situation:

• 180 units
• Price-conscious residents
• High sensitivity to $25-50 differences
• Competing against larger, newer properties

Implementation: Focused competitive intelligence on value positioning

Discoveries:

• Newer comps charged $150-200 more
• But they had mandatory fees property didn't (trash, pest control, etc.)
• Property's "all-inclusive" rent was actually competitive
• Prospects didn't understand total cost differences

Strategic changes:

• Created "all-inclusive rent" positioning
• Breakdown cards showing fee comparisons
• Trained team to educate on total housing cost
• Emphasized stability and community (avg 4-year residency)

Results (6 months):

• Occupancy: 88% → 94%
• Resident quality improved (better payment history)
• Turnover decreased 22%
• Zero concessions needed
• Renewal rate: 51% → 63%

The Competitive Intelligence Mindset

Winning properties think differently:

Stop Thinking:

• ❌ "We're the best property in the market"
• ❌ "If we lower prices, we'll fill units"
• ❌ "Residents just want the cheapest option"
• ❌ "Our property sells itself"

Start Thinking:

• ✅ "How do we compare on every factor prospects care about?"
• ✅ "What's the total value proposition vs. competitors?"
• ✅ "Which residents are we best positioned to serve?"
• ✅ "How do we win the comparison before it becomes about price?"

Implementation Roadmap

Week 1: Intelligence Gathering

• Identify all direct competitors
• Begin monitoring pricing and concessions
• Document current market positioning
• Audit your current competitive responses

Week 2: Analysis

• Compare your offering vs. each competitor
• Calculate effective rent vs. asking rent
• Identify your true differentiators
• Spot pricing opportunities

Week 3: Strategic Planning

• Adjust pricing where needed
• Revise concession strategy
• Update value propositions
• Prepare training materials

Week 4: Team Training

• Share competitive intelligence
• Practice comparison conversations
• Role-play objection handling
• Build confidence with data

Ongoing: Competitive Monitoring

• Weekly market updates
• Monthly strategy reviews
• Quarterly deep analysis
• Continuous improvement

The Bottom Line: Knowledge is Power

Every lease you win is a lease a competitor loses.

The properties that win consistently aren't lucky. They're not necessarily newer, cheaper, or better located. They're simply better informed.

They know:

• What every competitor is offering
• Where they have advantages
• How to position those advantages
• When to push and when to hold
• What prospects are actually comparing

You can't win a competition you don't understand.

Your prospects will tour 3-4 properties before deciding. They're comparing everything. They have all the information.

The only question: Do you?

Conclusion: The Competitive Advantage is Information

The multifamily industry has fundamentally changed. Properties operating with quarterly rent surveys and anecdotal competitive information are losing ground to operators with real-time market intelligence.

The cost of not knowing what competitors are doing isn't just lost leases—it's:

• Constant occupancy struggles
• Revenue left on the table
• Unnecessary concessions
• Demoralized leasing teams
• Reactive instead of proactive management

The properties maintaining 95%+ occupancy aren't doing anything magical. They simply know more about their market than their competitors do. And they use that information to win leases, day after day, month after month.

The competitive intelligence advantage compounds over time. Each lease won is a lease lost by a competitor. Each occupancy point is worth tens of thousands in NOI. Each percentage point in renewal rate saves thousands in turn costs.

Your prospects are already comparing you to everyone else. It's time you did the same.

---

Ready to stop losing leases to better-informed competitors? Aryna's PriceWatch gives you real-time intelligence on every competitor in your market—pricing, concessions, availability, and trends. Win more leases with better information. Schedule a demo or start your free trial today.